2012 - and 20 years of PCR

Posted by John on 24 January 2012 | 5 Comments

Tags: ,

Happy 2012 to everyone. Of course I relate most things to PCR stuff (well, this is a PCR blog) and this year marks 20 years since I first did a reaction. Which means it's 20 years since my first blank gel and 20 years since I amplified strange bands, wrong-sized bands - before hitting the conditions and getting it right.
Or at least for the positive control. . .

Things I remember?

  • While developing a new method, being given a tube of Taq, buffer and MgCl2 and following a paper (it used the same single primer)
  • PCRs then were in 0.5ml tubes and about 100µl volumes
  • Since I was only running 10µl on a gel, I figured I didn't need the other 80µl immediately chopped all volumes 5-fold (including the enzyme) to 20µl reactions
  • 2 drops of oil as the overlay (yep, no heated lid). Plus greasing the tubes with the same oil on tissue paper before seating over the machine with the car headlamp as the heating element.
  • Another student speeding up the tube greasing by dropping oil straight into the wells. Since the wells weren't solid, much smoke resulting as the oil heated on the lamp!
  • Back then Taq was about $1.20 a unit. Now we're under 20 cents a unit (check out FIREPol)
  • No hotstart enzymes. Hotstart - when I used it - was adding the MgCl2 to the reaction tube during a pause in the first annealing step.
  • My positive control was just under 3kb. That was considered a long amplicon and I was asked from time to time how I got my 'big PCR' to work by others (ironically, low enzyme amounts would later be shown to be useful for longer PCRs). But then we were amazed to read of enzyme blends going out to 35kb.

I consider myself lucky to learn about PCR then and learn some of its fun attributes. Thanks Iain.
(I would later take some small perverse delight in sending papers to my former supervisor that made the method I developed obsolete)

You still remember your own first PCR reactions? Please share your memories. . .


Post your comment

Comments

  • Hi John

    My first job out of University was in 1990, and in that lab we were still using three water baths for PCR. We would sit there with a timer, and every minute would move the tubes from one water bath to the next. After each minute in the 95 degree water bath, we would uncap each tube and add fresh enzyme (in those days it was ordinary DNA polymerase, not heat tolerant Taq). Geesh, amazing we got any work done. A few years later, things had moved on and we had a 'real' thermocycler, and heat stable Taq was commercially available, but as you mention, the proce was so high (and we were doing 50ul reactions so needed lots of Taq) that we couldn't afford to buy it. So we made our own illegal stuff. It was a very crude preparation, not doubt full of E.Coli DNA even after a sonication step, but worked just fine for the human work we were doing. I don't really miss those days! Ha, just don't get me going on old school sequencing with isothermal enzymes, PAGE gels and radioactive labeling, exposed on X-ray films that we developed in a darkroom, thus forever walking around with silver stained lab coats. IF everything went well then we could manually read the films and write the sequence down one nucleotide at a time.

    Posted by Allison Miller, 22/06/2012 12:27pm (11 months ago)

  • Our old thermal cycler (late 1990's) would continue cycling through the three temperatures you set indefinitely. There was a little number counter on the top that told you how many cycles it had run (ever) so you had to add on how cycles you wanted, and then make sure you were around when the counter ticked over to that number of cycles so you could quickly stop the reactions! Looking back, I'm amazed we ever got anything to work.

    Posted by Natalie, 22/06/2012 11:53am (11 months ago)

  • Most enzymes still do contain E. coli DNA I think Ian? A few qPCR masters now around which have no signal with various 16S assays - but the issue still around.
    Happy 20 years for your PCR as well then ! ;-)

    Posted by John, 31/01/2012 11:36am (1 year ago)

  • Hi John,

    1992 was my first PCR - Parvovirus B19. It was the first test developed by my boss (Theo) to identify a relatively new virus, that we couldn't culture, in children with "fifth disease". We too had the 0.5mL tubes but not so sure about the car headlight J! We were a bit more civilized then (thanks to a Corbett thermal cycler). It was clear that viral diagnostics were about to get a big boost. We pretty quickly threw in HHV-6 and then 7 and many other viruses followed . Then came multiplexing..I see Tavi's page, which was an early help for all those variables, is still around.

    I remember some Taq sources that you couldn't use for a 16S-targetted assay to detect bacteria because they still contained bacterial nucleic acids!

    Now I'm waiting for 20 cent arrays and NGS reactions!

    Posted by IanM, 31/01/2012 10:47am (1 year ago)

  • I remember our old PCR machine - where we never trusted the outer wells. And primers were expensive!

    Posted by Brian Finney, 30/01/2012 11:29pm (1 year ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments

© DNATURE Limited 2013